Legal Opinion

Gore v. Blanchard

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided November 24, 1922PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSlack, J.

The action is tort to recover damages which the plaintiff claims to have suffered from not being allowed to use *237a certain way, which he claims was a public or common way, during the winter of 1920-21. At the close of the plaintiff’s evidence the court, on motion of defendant, directed a verdict in his favor to which the plaintiff saved an exception. The plaintiff urges several reasons why the case should have been submitted to the jury. His chief claim is that as against the land owner, the defendant, the public had acquired the right, by dedication and by prescription, to use the way in…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. O'Connell v. Chicago Terminal Transfer RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1900
  2. City & County of San Francisco v. GroteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Shaver v. EdgellWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1900
  4. Parrott v. StewartOregon Supreme Court · 1913
  5. F. A. Hihn Co. v. City of Santa CruzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. McIntyre v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Colorado · 2004
  2. Community Feed Store, Inc. v. Northeastern Culvert Corp.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1989
  3. President of Middlebury College v. Central Power Corp.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1928
  4. Druke v. Town of NewfaneSupreme Court of Vermont · 1979
  5. Boston & M. R. R. v. DanielCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1923

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API