Legal Opinion

Deerhead Township v. Fritz

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided June 8, 1940No. 34,760PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Hoch, J.:

This was an action to recover on an injunction bond. The defendants filed a cross petition alleging that an agreement had been made for a compromise settlement of the controversy involved in the injunction proceedings; that the plaintiff had broken the contract of settlement, and asking damages therefor. The case is here on appeal from an order sustaining a demurrer to the amended cross petition and from an order sustaining plaintiff’s motion for judgment on the pleadings and the opening statement of counsel for defendants.

George Fritz owned a…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Eikenberry v. Township of BazaarSupreme Court of Kansas · 1879
  2. Arnold v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1930
  3. Moseman v. L. M. Penwell Undertaking Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1940
  4. Fisher v. Delaware TownshipSupreme Court of Kansas · 1912
  5. Mundell v. FranseSupreme Court of Kansas · 1936

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Barker v. FlemingSupreme Court of Kansas · 1944
  2. Bisagno v. LaneSupreme Court of Kansas · 1949
  3. Powers v. ThornSupreme Court of Kansas · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API