Legal Opinion

Nelson v. Lippman

New York Court of Appeals

Decided December 21, 2000PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.4), on defendants’ appeal, order reversed, without costs, plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment denied, defendants’ cross motion for summary judgment granted, judgment granted declaring that Judiciary Law §§ 221-e and 221-d, insofar as challenged here, are constitutional and complaint otherwise dismissed. The significant differences in case filings and dispositions provide a rational basis for the challenged disparity (see, Barr v Crosson, 95 NY2d 164; D’Amico v Crosson,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. D'AMICO v. CrossonNew York Court of Appeals · 1999
  2. Henry v. MilonasNew York Court of Appeals · 1998
  3. Barr v. CrossonNew York Court of Appeals · 2000

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Friia v. PfauAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API