State v. Dorenbos
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Per curiam
— Alan Dorenbos sought to vacate a restitution order, alleging that the order was untimely because it was entered more than 60 days after sentencing. But Dorenbos’ motion was also untimely as it was filed over seven years after the restitution order was entered, far beyond the one-year time limit for collateral attack. We thus affirm the superior court’s ruling denying Dorenbos’ motion.
Facts
Alan Dorenbos was found guilty of second degree murder for killing his wife and was sentenced for that crime on December 8, 1992. On December 3, 1993, the trial court entered an order imposing $9,364.56 in…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- State v. AmmonsWashington Supreme Court · 2005
- LaMon v. ButlerWashington Supreme Court · 1989
- State v. MoenWashington Supreme Court · 1996
- In re the Personal Restraint of StoudmireWashington Supreme Court · 2000
- In re the Personal Restraint of FlemingWashington Supreme Court · 1996
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Jones v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 2011
- State v. DorenbosCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2002
- John Garrett Smith v. J.C. MillerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2023
- State v. DorenbosCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2002