Legal Opinion
Lloyd v. Greater Cleveland Regional Transit Authority
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided April 20, 2022No. 1:18-cv-01557Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION ROLANDA LLOYD, Case No. 1:18-cv-01557-PAB Plaintiff, -vs- JUDGE PAMELA A. BARKER GREATER CLEVELAND REGIONAL TRANSIT AUTHORITY, MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Defendant. Currently pending is Plaintiff Rolanda Lloyd’s Motion for an Award of Attorneys’ Fees, Costs and Prejudgment Interest Against Defendant. (Doc. No. 88.) GCRTA filed an Opposition to Lloyd’s Motion on November 29, 2021, to which Lloyd replied on December 5, 2022. (Doc. Nos. 91, 95.) For the following reasons, Lloyd’s Motion is GRANTED in part…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Imwalle v. Reliance Medical Products, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
- Moskovitz v. Mt. Sinai Medical CenterOhio Supreme Court · 1994
- Janice Adcock-Ladd v. Secretary of Treasury United States Secret Service Department of TreasuryCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.