Legal Opinion

In re Huntington

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided May 7, 1895PublishedCited by 4 opinions

This was an application for a warrant for the removal of O. P. Huntington to California for trial upon an indictment charging him with issuing a free pass for railroad transportation contrary to the interstate commerce law.

1Opinion of the Court

BROWN, District Judge.

Application is made under section 1014, Rev. St. U: S., for the removal of Mr. Huntington to California for trial upon an indictment found there on January 10, 1894, for issuing to Frank M. Stone in California, in violation of the, act of February 4, 1887 (24 Stat. 379), a “free pass” in the following words: “Southern Pacific Company: Pass Frank M. Stone over lines of the Southern Pacific Company 1894 until December 31, unless otherwise ordered.”

The indictment charges that by this free pass the defendant did willfully and unlawfully, and knowingly, make and give an…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. United States v. HessSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  2. United States v. LacherSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  3. United States v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  4. United States v. FowkesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1892
  5. United States v. GreenuutDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1892

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Armour Packing Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1907
  2. Ex Parte ShowCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1910
  3. Pereles v. WeilDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1907
  4. United States v. YarboroughDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 1903

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API