Legal Opinion

Summers v. Interstate Tractor & Equipment Co.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided August 18, 1972No. 25740PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FERGUSON, District Judge:

This appeal is from a jury verdict in a diversity action. We affirm.

The action was filed against Interstate Tractor and Equipment Company (Interstate) and General Motors Corporation (General Motors) for the wrongful death of the deceased. The action was tried on the theory of strict liability. The verdict was against Interstate only, and it has appealed.

The appeal involves three issues:

(A) The sufficiency of the evidence to permit the issue of liability to go to the jury.

(B) The refusal of the district court to apply the Oregon $25,000 limitation on wrongful death…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  3. Lavender v. KurnSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  4. Bernhardt v. Polygraphic Co. of America, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1956
  5. Reich v. PurcellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Charles Silberman v. Miami Dade TransitCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2019
  2. Farmer v. International Harvester CompanyIdaho Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Warnie Lee Ivy, Cross-Appellants v. Security Barge Lines, Inc., Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
  4. Vorhees v. BaltazarSupreme Court of Kansas · 2007
  5. Proprietors Ins. Co. v. ValsecchiDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API