Legal Opinion
Borowicz v. Hood
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided April 30, 1965PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
87 N.J. Super. 418 (1965)
209 A.2d 655
WALTER J. BOROWICZ, AN INFANT BY HIS GUARDIAN AD LITEM, WALTER E. BOROWICZ, STASIA M. BOROWICZ, AND WALTER E. BOROWICZ, INDIVIDUALLY, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS,
v.
WILLIAM J. HOOD, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued April 5, 1965.
Decided April 30, 1965.
Before Judges CONFORD, KILKENNY and LEWIS.
Mr. Myron W. Kronisch argued the cause for appellants (Messrs. Roskein, Kronisch & Felzenberg, attorneys).
Mr. Edward C. Hillis argued the cause for respondent (Messrs. Marley, Winkelried & Hillis, attorneys).
The opinion of the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Village of Ridgewood v. Sreel Investment Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1958
- Vadurro v. Yellow Cab Co. of CamdenSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1950
- Batts v. Joseph Newman, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1950
- Kargman v. CarloSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1914
- HARE EX REL. HARE v. PennellNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1955
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Navarro v. George Koch & Sons, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1986
- Kaplan v. HainesNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1967
- Feldman v. Lederle LaboratoriesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1993
- Cestero v. FerraraNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1970
- Joseph T. Ryerson & Son, Inc. v. H. A. Crane & Brother, Inc., Towmotor Corp., and Allied Chemical CorpCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1969
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.