Legal Opinion

Kargman v. Carlo

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided March 16, 1914PublishedCited by 24 opinions

On appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered hy

Trenchard, J.

This action was brought hy Sarah Kargman and Meyer Kargman, her husband, to recover from the defendant, Antonio Carlo, damages for an injury suffered by the plaintiff Sarah Kargman, at six forty-five o’clock in the evening of the 21st day of December, 1912, by falling, by reason of the absence of lights, while she was descending a stairway which she used in visiting a tenant on the third floor of the tenement-house owned and controlled hy the defendant.

The jury at the Hudson Circuit rendered a verdict for the plaintiffs and the defendant…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Williams v. LubberingSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1906
  2. Benz v. Central RailroadSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1912

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Ellis v. CapriceNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1967
  2. Lamendola v. MIZELLNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1971
  3. Cleary v. City of CamdenSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1937
  4. Crego v. CarpNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1996
  5. Marzotto v. Gay Garment Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1951

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API