Legal Opinion

Harriman National Bank v. Com'r of Internal Revenue

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided August 4, 1930No. 372PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SWAN, Circuit Judge.

The opinion below, reported in 14 B. T. A. 743, states that the sole question presented to the Board-was whether the bank was a dealer in securities during the taxable years under review, and as sueh entitled to return its income on the basis of inventories of its securities. The Commissioner had denied it the use of inventories, resulting in the imposition of deficiencies in taxes aggregating some $220,000. The Board of Tax Appeals confirmed these deficiencies on the ground that the evidence was insufficient and left the Board in doubt whether or not the bank was a dealer…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Mercantile Bank v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  2. Chicago Ry. Equipment Co. v. BlairCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1927
  3. People Ex Rel. Pratt v. GoldfogleNew York Court of Appeals · 1926
  4. Yerkes v. . National BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
  5. Bessemer Inv. Co. v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1929

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 95,770 United States of America v. Sidney SteinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1976
  2. Seeley v. HelveringCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1935
  3. Stephens, Inc., and Cross-Appellant v. United States of America, and Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1972
  4. Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. StevensCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1935
  5. Stokes v. RothensiesDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1945

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API