Legal Opinion

Stokes v. Rothensies

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided June 29, 1945No. 3196PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BARD, District Judge.

This is an action by Edward Lowber Stokes to recover $37,706.41, representing an allegedly excessive income tax paid by plaintiff for the calendar year 1936 and an assessment for the same calendar year made by the Commissioner of Internal Revenue together with interest from the dates of payment.

I make the following special

Findings of Fact

1. For the calendar year 1936 plaintiff paid to defendant in quarterly installments amounts totalling $44,004.67, representing individual income tax as reported and computed on his return for that year. Thereafter, on February 19, 1938,…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Lucas v. Kansas City Structural Steel Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1930
  2. Tefft v. GrantSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
  3. Schafer v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
  4. Finance & Guaranty Co. v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1931
  5. Seeley v. HelveringCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1935

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Kemon v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1951
  2. Stephens, Inc., and Cross-Appellant v. United States of America, and Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1972
  3. Memphis Furniture Manufacturing Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 1981
  4. Kemon v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1951
  5. Kemon v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1951

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API