Legal Opinion

Chicago Ry. Equipment Co. v. Blair

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided July 2, 1927No. 3853PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PAGE, Circuit Judge.

Erom the Commissioner’s assessment of additional tax, plaintiff in error, called plaintiff, appealed to the Board of Tax Appeals, and this writ of error brings the matter here.

This court’s jurisdiction is challenged on the ground that, when the provisions of section 283 (j) of the Revenue Act approved February 26, 1926 (44 Stat. 65), are applied to the facts, there is no right of appeal. Section 283 (j) is, in part, as follows:

“In eases within the scope of subdivision (b) or (f) of this section where any bearing before the board has been held before tbe enactment of this…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Muser v. MagoneSupreme Court of the United States · 1894

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. A. & A. Tool & Supply Co. v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1950
  2. Blackmer v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1934
  3. Schuh Trading Co. v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1938
  4. Schmidtlien Electric, Inc. v. GreathouseSupreme Court of Kansas · 2005
  5. Helvering v. Edison Securities CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1935

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API