Legal Opinion

Mann v. City of Lynchburg

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided March 17, 1921PublishedCited by 21 opinions

Questions certified from the Industrial Commission, pursuant to section 61 of the workmen’s compensation act (Acts 1918, p. 637). Claimant denied compensation.

1Per curiam

The Industrial Commission of Virginia, pursuant to the provision of section 61 of the workmen’s compensation act (Acts 1918, p. 637), has certified to this court for its decision certain questions of law arising in the above-entitled proceeding.

We quote as follows from the certificate of the commission:

“The claimant, Willie H. Mann, in her own right and in behalf of her two infant children, Bernard Mann, of the age of thirteen years, and Arthur Mann, of the age of ten years, has filed her application for hearing before the Industrial Commission of Virginia, setting up the claim of herself and…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. United States v. HartwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1868
  2. Powers v. Hotel Bond Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1915
  3. Hall v. WisconsinSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  4. Nichols v. . MacLeanNew York Court of Appeals · 1886
  5. Smith v. BryanSupreme Court of Virginia · 1902

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Hayes v. . Elon CollegeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
  2. Hayes v. Board of Trustees of Elon CollegeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
  3. Harris v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1926
  4. Parker v. Travelers InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1932
  5. State v. HordSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API