Legal Opinion
Smith v. Griffith
Supreme Court of Kansas
Decided October 11, 1919No. 21,914PublishedCited by 10 opinions
Appeal from Pottawatomie district court; Robert C. Heizer, judge.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
West, J.:
Smith and his wife, as vendors, sued Griffith and his wife, as vendees, for a portion of the price of a tract of land. The plaintiffs recovered, and the defendants appeal.
The’ contract contained the following provisions:
“Deed to be signed by parties of the first part and left in escrow at the Farmers State Bank, Wheaton, Kan., until second party obtains a mortgage on said land or until he pays for same, to be paid inside one month from date of this contract. First party to have the use of the above-described land to March 1, 1915, without cost…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Davis v. ClarkSupreme Court of Kansas · 1897
- Norman v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1917
- Gemienhardt v. WardSupreme Court of Kansas · 1917
- Fairbanks, Morse & Co. v. SimmonsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1918
3Cited by10 opinions
- Ford v. Guarantee Abstract & Title Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1976
- Blackburn v. McCoyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
- Sanders v. Park Towne, Ltd.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 1978
- Phoenix Title & Trust Co. v. HorwathArizona Supreme Court · 1933
- Nickell v. ReserSupreme Court of Kansas · 1936
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.