Legal Opinion

Smith v. Griffith

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided October 11, 1919No. 21,914PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal from Pottawatomie district court; Robert C. Heizer, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

West, J.:

Smith and his wife, as vendors, sued Griffith and his wife, as vendees, for a portion of the price of a tract of land. The plaintiffs recovered, and the defendants appeal.

The’ contract contained the following provisions:

“Deed to be signed by parties of the first part and left in escrow at the Farmers State Bank, Wheaton, Kan., until second party obtains a mortgage on said land or until he pays for same, to be paid inside one month from date of this contract. First party to have the use of the above-described land to March 1, 1915, without cost…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Davis v. ClarkSupreme Court of Kansas · 1897
  2. Norman v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1917
  3. Gemienhardt v. WardSupreme Court of Kansas · 1917
  4. Fairbanks, Morse & Co. v. SimmonsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1918

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Ford v. Guarantee Abstract & Title Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1976
  2. Blackburn v. McCoyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
  3. Sanders v. Park Towne, Ltd.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 1978
  4. Phoenix Title & Trust Co. v. HorwathArizona Supreme Court · 1933
  5. Nickell v. ReserSupreme Court of Kansas · 1936

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API