Legal Opinion

Nickell v. Reser

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided May 9, 1936No. 32,779PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Harvey, J.:

Plaintiffs brought this action to set aside an oil royalty deed of conveyance executed by them on the ground it had been wrongfully delivered by an escrow holder, and in the alternative for damages for the value of the conveyance at the time of the wrongful delivery. Among the defenses was that of ratification of the delivery. The original grantees in the conveyance, the escrow holder, and the record owners, through mesne conveyance of the interest conveyed by the oil royalty deed, were made parties defendant. The trial court found the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Davis v. ClarkSupreme Court of Kansas · 1897
  2. Smith v. GriffithSupreme Court of Kansas · 1919
  3. Christy v. Central State BankSupreme Court of Kansas · 1925

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Ford v. Guarantee Abstract & Title Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1976
  2. Fancher v. Carson-Campbell, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1975
  3. Wyoming Bank & Trust Co. v. WaughWyoming Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Osborn v. GregoSupreme Court of Kansas · 1979
  5. Foreman v. ToddIdaho Supreme Court · 1961

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API