Sacramento Suburban Fruit Lands Co. v. Tatham
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
DIETRICH, Circuit Judge.
In its background this suit is like Sacramento Suburban Fruit Lands Co. v. Melin and Companion Cases, 36 F.(2d) 907 to page 950. It was commenced on September 11, 1928. The plaintiffs (appellees) are husband and wife, and in January, 1924, were living in Minnesota, at which time and place they contracted with defendant t® purchase fifteen • acres of the Rio Linda tract, near Sacramento, Cal., at $375 per acre. They had had some experience in farming in the East but none in California. They left Minnesota and came to Sacramento in February, 1924. Having inspected the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Ex Parte American Steel Barrel Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Smith v. BollesSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
- Sigafus v. PorterSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- Craven v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1927
- Sacramento Suburban Fruit Lands Co. v. MelinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1929
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Morse v. LewisCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1932
- Price v. JohnstonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1942
- Wilkes v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1935
- Cole v. Loew's Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 1948
- Duplan Corp. v. Deering Milliken, Inc.District Court, D. South Carolina · 1975
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.