Legal Opinion
Beatty v. State Tax Commission
Supreme Court of Missouri
Decided December 19, 1995No. 78410PublishedCited by 53 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ROBERTSON, Judge.
House Bill No. 211, 1995 Laws of Missouri _, West’s No. 65, § A 256-261, repeals former section 137.016, RSMo 1994, and enacts a new section 137.016, RSMo 1995, effective August 28, 1995. H.B. 211 contains a broader definition of the term “residential property” than its predecessor and makes that new definition applicable as of January 1, 1995. Appellants in this ease, claim that the resulting reclassification of certain types of residential real property for purpose of assessing taxes for the 1995 tax year and the recoupment of lost tax revenue provision in section 137.016…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- United States v. SalernoSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Thummel v. KingSupreme Court of Missouri · 1978
- Doe v. Roman Catholic Diocese of Jefferson CitySupreme Court of Missouri · 1993
- Madison Block Pharmacy, Inc. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1981
- Dial v. Lathrop R-II School DistrictSupreme Court of Missouri · 1994
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by53 opinions
- Giddens v. Kansas City Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 2000
- Rafael Lozano v. BNSF Railway CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 2014
- Carter v. St. John's Regional Medical CenterMissouri Court of Appeals · 2002
- Luft v. SchoenhoffMissouri Court of Appeals · 1996
- State v. WoodworthMissouri Court of Appeals · 1997
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.