Legal Opinion

French Kreme Co. v. United States

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided May 7, 1928No. 3034PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHatfield, Judge

Merchandise, consisting of egg yolk in the form of powder and described in the several invoices as “Spray Hen Yolk,” “Dried Spray Egg Yolk,” “Dried Hen Egg Yolk,” and “Hen Egg Yolk-Spray,” was assessed for duty by the collector at the port of New York at 18 cents per pound under paragraph 713 of the Tariff Act of 1922 as “dried egg yolk.”

Paragraph 713'reads as follows:

Pab. 713. Eggs of poultry, in the shell, 8 cents per dozen; whole eggs, egg yolk, and egg albumen, frozen or otherwise prepared or preserved, and not specially provided for, 6 cents per pound; dried whole eggs, dried egg yolk,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. FrankCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1927
  2. La Manna v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1926
  3. Central Warehouse Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1926

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States v. John B. Stetson Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1933
  2. French Kreme Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1930
  3. Harper v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1935
  4. United States v. A. Sahadi & Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1936
  5. United States v. MossCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API