Legal Opinion

Central Warehouse Co. v. United States

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided December 14, 1926No. 2779PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hatfield, Judge;

delivered the opinion of the court:

Merchandise, consisting of rugs made of rice straw and bound with a cotton warp, known in the trade and commerce of the United States, as “Japan rice straw rugs” and as “rice straw rugs,” was assessed for duty by the collector under paragraph 1022 of the Tariff Act of 1922, at 40 per centum ad valorem as “floor coverings not specially provided for.”

Paragraph 1022 reads as follows:

Par. 1022. Common China, Japan, and India straw matting, and floor coverings made therefrom, 3 cents per square yard; carpets, carpeting, mats, matting, and rugs,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Central Warehouse Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. French Kreme Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1928
  2. French Kreme Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1930
  3. United States v. MossCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API