Driver v. F. W. Woolworth Co.
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, P. J.
Judgment was obtained in the Court of Common Pleas by the plaintiff, appellee in this court, upon a petition wbicb, in substance, averred tbat tbe defendant, appellant bere, did sell to tbe plaintiff a certain article of beauty preparation known as and described as “Pinaud’s Six-Twelve Runproof Mascara,” representing same to be in all respects a proper cosmetic to use on this plaintiff’s eyebrows and eyelashes; that plaintiff purchased a tube of the same in reliance upon the representations; that, after the application of said mascara to her eyebrows and eyelashes, she was seriously infected…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. HughesOhio Supreme Court · 1936
- Reynolds v. Burgess Sulphite Fibre Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1902
3Cited by6 opinions
- Poulos v. Parker Sweeper Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1989
- Levin v. Cleveland Welding Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1963
- Welsh v. GibbonsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1948
- Knob v. Copeland Refrigeration Corp.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1963
- Sorg Paper Co. v. MurphyDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1986
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.