Legal Opinion
Sorg Paper Co. v. Murphy
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided July 11, 1986No. C-1-85-1235PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS
SPIEGEL, District Judge:
This matter came on for consideration of defendant William Murphy’s motion for an order dismissing the complaint, pursuant to Rules 8 and 12, Fed.R.Civ.P., because the Court lacks jurisdiction to entertain the action and because the complaint fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted (doc. 6). Plaintiff filed its response in opposition (doc. 9), to which defendant has replied (doc. 11).
I. Facts and Procedural Posture
In this ease, it appears that the Sorg Paper Company has alleged a potential tort…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Mitchell v. ForsythSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Butz v. EconomouSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Parsons v. AguirreDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1988