Legal Opinion

Kmatz v. Metropolitan Life Insurance

District Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided October 20, 2005No. 2:04-cv-00436PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ENTRY AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND OVERRULING IN PART DEFENDANTS ABX, AIRBORNE AND METLIFE’S MOTION TO DISMISS (Doc. #11), OVERRULING DEFENDANTS ABX, AIRBORNE AND MET-LIFE’S MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER (Doc. #12) AND OVERRULING DEFENDANT GAINES’ MOTION TO DISMISS (Doc. # 18)

ROSE, District Judge.

This action arises from the alleged improper payment of life insurance benefits to Defendant Jennifer Gaines (“Gaines”) by Defendant Metropolitan Life Insurance Company (“MetLife”). 1 The life insurance benefits were paid on a policy insuring the life of Joseph M. Kmatz (the “Decedent”). The benefits…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Pilot Life Insurance v. DedeauxSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. Metropolitan Life Insurance v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. Varity Corp. v. HoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1996

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Sullivan v. Cap Gemini Ernst & Young U.S.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2008
  2. Vasu v. American United Life Insurance Co.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2017
  3. Weaver v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2010
  4. Colmer v. Administrative Concepts, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2022
  5. Klaiss v. Steel Tool & Engineering CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API