Brown v. Getty Reserve Oil, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
DODSON, Justice.
In this interpleader action, the trial court rendered summary judgment unitizing Sections 27 and 29, Block One (1), Cherokee Furnace Company Survey, Hansford County, Texas, for the production of gas from a well located on Section 29. Each of the sections contains 320 acres of land, more or less, and is commonly called a “Spanish Section.” There is no producing gas well situated on Section 27. On appeal, the Section 29 royalty owners maintain that the trial court erroneously unitized their inter est in Section 29 with Section 27. Agreeing with the Section 29 royalty owners, we…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Brown v. SmithTexas Supreme Court · 1943
- Montgomery v. RittersbacherTexas Supreme Court · 1968
- Virgil Mathews v. Sun Oil Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1968
- French v. GeorgeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1942
- Parker v. ParkerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1940
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Fort Worth Transp. Auth. v. RodriguezTexas Supreme Court · 2018
- Bank One, Texas, N.A. v. TaylorCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992
- Olmos v. Pecan Grove Municipal Utility DistrictCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1993
- MCZ, INC. v. Triolo, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1986
- London v. Merriman, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1988
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.