Legal Opinion

Montgomery v. Rittersbacher

Texas Supreme Court

Decided January 24, 1968No. B-160PublishedCited by 57 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SMITH, Justice.

Petitioner, W. R. Montgomery, brought this suit to establish his right to accumulated and prospective royalty under an oil, gas and mineral lease. The material facts are undisputed. The trial court in a non-jury trial rendered judgment that Montgomery take nothing. The Court of Civil Appeals affirmed. 410 S.W.2d 925. We reverse the judgments of the courts below and remand the cause to the trial court with instructions.

In 1945 Montgomery conveyed approximately eighty (80) acres of land, designated in the record as “First Tract,” to Respondents’ predecessors in title but reserved…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Veal v. ThomasonTexas Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Brown v. SmithTexas Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Ryan Consolidated Petroleum Corp. v. PickensTexas Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Loeffler v. KingTexas Supreme Court · 1951
  5. Texas & Pacific Coal & Oil Co. v. KirtleyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1926

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by57 opinions

  1. Charles G. Hooks, III v. Samson Lone Star, Limited Partnership, N/K/A Samson Lone Star LlcTexas Supreme Court · 2015
  2. Samson Exploration, LLC (Formerly Samson Lone Star, L.P.) v. T.S. Reed Properties, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 2017
  3. Hawkins v. Texas Oil and Gas Corp., Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)1987
  4. Samson Lone Star, Ltd. Partnership v. HooksCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2012
  5. MCEN 1996 PARTNERSHIP v. Glassell, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2001

52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API