Legal Opinion

In Re Corbin

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided February 16, 1999No. 98SA432PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

The respondent and the complainant in this lawyer discipline case entered into a stipulation, agreement, and conditional admission of misconduct. See C.R.C.P. 241.18. The conditional admission recommended that the respondent, Charles Canterbury Corbin, be either suspended for three years or be disbarred, with certain restitution to be made prior to reinstatement or readmission. An inquiry panel of the supreme court grievance committee approved the conditional admission and recommended that the respondent be suspended for three years, but that the date of the suspension be made retroactive to…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. People v. TownshendSupreme Court of Colorado · 1997
  2. People v. AbelmanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1991
  3. People v. LujanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1995
  4. People v. MurraySupreme Court of Colorado · 1994
  5. People v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1997

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In Re ThompsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1999
  2. People v. RitlandSupreme Court of Colorado · 2014
  3. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. CorbinOhio Supreme Court · 2000
  4. People v. CorbinSupreme Court of Colorado · 2003
  5. Disciplinary Counsel v. CorbinOhio Supreme Court · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API