Legal Opinion

Pool Water Products v. Olin Corp.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided August 3, 2001No. 99-56933PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FISHER, Circuit Judge:

OVERVIEW

Plaintiffs-appellants Aqua Tri and Pool Water Products (“plaintiffs”) allege that defendants-appellees Olin and Superior Pool Products (“defendants”) have engaged in a “whole host” of anticompetitive activities, including the illegal acquisition of a fellow dry chemical manufacturer, FMC. That acquisition was deemed illegal by the Federal Trade Commission in a separate proceeding. In a series of pretrial motions, plaintiffs asked the district court to give the FTC decision prima facie weight in this proceeding under Section 5 of the Clayton Act, 15 U.S.C. §…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Associated General Contractors of California, Inc. v. California State Council of CarpentersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Brunswick Corp. v. Pueblo Bowl-O-Mat, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. Atlantic Richfield Co. v. USA Petroleum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
  4. Brooke Group Ltd. v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  5. Cargill, Inc. v. Monfort of Colorado, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Joan Cherie Amadeo v. Principal Mutual Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
  2. Joseph v. JJ Mac Intyre Companies, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2002
  3. Grisham v. Philip Morris, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2009
  4. Andrea Doreen Ltd. v. Building Material Local Union 282District Court, E.D. New York · 2004
  5. In Re Light Cigarettes Marketing Sales Practices LitigationDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2010

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API