Myrick v. City of Cincinnati, C-080119 (12-26-2008)
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION.
{¶ 1} Defendants-appellants, the city of Cincinnati and four unnamed city employees working as 911 operators and 911 supervisors, appeal the trial court's judgment denying their motion to dismiss plaintiff-appellee Lynetta Myrick's complaint against them.1 The complaint alleged that they had acted willfully, wantonly, and recklessly in responding to Myrick's emergency request for assistance after her young child had been abducted by Myrick's presumed-to-be mentally ill, estranged husband. Because the city's employees did not act recklessly by directing Myrick to pull over to speak to…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited10 opinions
- O'Brien v. University Community Tenants Union, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1975
- Fabrey v. McDonald Village Police DepartmentOhio Supreme Court · 1994
- Thompson v. McNeillOhio Supreme Court · 1990
- Hubbell v. City of XeniaOhio Supreme Court · 2007
- Marchetti v. KalishOhio Supreme Court · 1990
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Plush v. CincinnatiOhio Court of Appeals · 2020
- Miller v. Van Wert Cty. Bd. of Mental Retardation & Dev. DisabilitiesOhio Court of Appeals · 2009
- Munday v. Lincoln Hts.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2013