Legal Opinion

Marshall v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided June 22, 2007No. A07A1272PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Ruffin, Judge.

Kenneth Earl Marshall was charged with one count of theft by taking a motor vehicle and one count of possessing cocaine. Following a bench trial, Judge William Smith found Marshall guilty of both counts. On appeal, Marshall challenges the sufficiency of the evidence and contends that his custodial statement should have been suppressed because it was made before he had been informed of his Miranda rights.

1. When reviewing a challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence “we determine whether, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Robison v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2006
  2. Poole v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2004
  3. Campbell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2002
  4. Bills v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2007
  5. Meyers v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2006

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Thornton v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2009
  2. Davis v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2010
  3. Williams v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2011
  4. Walker v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2008
  5. Watkins v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API