Legal Opinion

Poole v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided November 15, 2004No. A04A1199PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mikell, Judge.

Robert Poole appeals from the trial court’s order revoking his probation for committing armed robbery during his probation period and failing to pay court-ordered fines and restitution. Poole asserts that the trial court erred by: (1) failing to suppress a handwriting sample he gave to police; (2) failing to suppress evidence obtained in a photo lineup; (3) qualifying an expert in forensic document examination; and (4) concluding that a preponderance of the evidence showed that he had committed armed robbery. We granted Poole’s application for discretionary review to consider…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Escobedo v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. Thomas v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2001
  4. Hardeman v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1984
  5. Hardin v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1998

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Boone v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2008
  2. Rowell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2011
  3. Harmon v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2006
  4. Monahan v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2008
  5. Franklin v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2007

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API