Legal Opinion
Koepke v. Schumacher
Appellate Court of Illinois
Decided February 18, 1946No. Gen. No. 43,150PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Matghett
Koepke was plaintiff in a suit to foreclose a mortgage on real estate in which Mrs. Campo claimed an interest. She was served by publication only. He obtained a decree November 24, 1942. The premises were sold to Koepke December 23, 1942. Mrs. Campo filed a petition February 16, 1944 to have the decree set aside as to her and for leave to answer. This was after the period of redemption had expired. Koepke filed a verified answer to her petition. It was stricken on motion of Mrs. Campo, and a motion of Koepke to vacate the order was denied. He elected to abide by his answer, and an order in…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Roggenbuck v. BreuhausIllinois Supreme Court · 1928
- Aurora & Geneva Railway Co. v. HarveyIllinois Supreme Court · 1899
- In re Estate of MaherIllinois Supreme Court · 1904
- Ziolkowski v. Continental Casualty Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1937
- Schmidt v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United StatesIllinois Supreme Court · 1941
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Campo v. NiemeyerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1950
- Jacobs v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1949