Kilfoyle v. Heyison
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
KNOX, District Judge.
This case is presently before a statutory three-judge court convened pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 2281 and 2284. Once more we are required to consider the due process nuances of Bell v. Burson, 402 U.S. 535, 91 S.Ct. 1586, 29 L.Ed.2d 90 (1971). References to the flexible concepts of due process of law contained therein as applied to varying situations appear in Goss v. Lopez, 419 U.S. 565, 95 S.Ct. 729, 42 L.Ed.2d 725 (1975) (suspension of a student in the public schools) and Mathews v. Eldridge, 424 U.S. 319, 96 S.Ct. 893, 47 L.Ed.2d 18 (1976) (termination of social…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Monroe v. PapeSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Goss v. LopezSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Bell v. BursonSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Franklin v. City of ChicagoDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1984
- Laurido v. SimonDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1980
- Lee v. Board of Higher Ed. in City of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1979
- Westcott v. CalifanoDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1978
- Piercy v. HeyisonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1977
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.