Legal Opinion

Piercy v. Heyison

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided November 4, 1977No. 76-2635PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

GIBBONS, Circuit Judge.

In this appeal from an order granting summary judgment to the defendants, we consider, hopefully for the last time, the powers of a single district judge to pass upon a constitutional challenge to a state statute without convening a three-judge district court. Appellant contends that section 1413 of the Pennsylvania Vehicle Code, Pa.Stat.Ann. tit. 75, § 1413 (Purdon),1 vio*856lates procedural due process by authorizing the suspension of her driver’s license without affording her a hearing. In the District Court below, a single judge held that appellant’s…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Bell v. BursonSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Hicks v. MirandaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Samuel Bailey v. Joe T. PattersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  4. D. H. Overmyer Co., Inc. of Ohio v. Frick Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Goosby v. OsserSupreme Court of the United States · 1973

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In Re SoudersUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1987
  2. Commercial National Bank of Peoria v. KermeenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
  3. Piercy v. HeyisonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API