Legal Opinion

Meisel v. Spielman Motor Sales Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 29, 1942Published

1Opinion of the Court

Plaintiff sued two defendants, each on tlnee separate causes of action. The causes of action against one of the corporations did not involve an examination of a long account. Two of the causes of action against the other defendant were for services rendered in each of two successive years, the compensation being one per cent of the total of the F. O. B. prices of all new automobiles sold and delivered by said defendant during each year, provided said defendant’s business during each of the years showed a profit; *902and the third cause of action against that defendant was for services rendered…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Schaffer v. City Bank Farmers Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1936
  2. Konheim v. HarrisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1911

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API