Legal Opinion

Schaffer v. City Bank Farmers Trust Co.

New York Court of Appeals

Decided January 7, 1936PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHubbs, J.

The appeal in this case was permitted by the Appellate Division of the third department which has certified to us the following question: “ Is this action properly referable under section 466 of the Civil Practice Act?

That section reads in part:

“ § 466. Compulsory reference. The court, of its own motion, or upon the application of either party, without the consent of the other, may direct a trial of the issues of fact, by a referee, where the trial will require the examination of a long account on either side and will not require the decision of difficult questions of law.”

In a general way…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Steck v. Colorado Fuel & Iron Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1894
  2. Irving v. IrvingNew York Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Snell v. . Niagara Paper MillsNew York Court of Appeals · 1908

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. MOTOR VEHICLE MFRS. v. StateNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
  2. Glass v. ThompsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
  3. Motor Vehicle Manufacturers Ass'n of the United States, Inc. v. StateNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
  4. Meisel v. Spielman Motor Sales Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1942
  5. Richards v. BlackAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API