Legal Opinion

Konheim v. Harris

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 29, 1911PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal by the plaintiff, Maurice S. Konheim, from an order of the Supreme Court, made at the New York Special Term and entered in the office of the clerk of the county of New York on the 26th day of October, 1911, granting the defendants’ motion to refer the issues in the action to a referee to hear, try and determine.

1Opinion of the Court

Laughlin, J.:

This is an action at law to recover a balance claimed to be owing by the defendants, who are copartners, to the plaintiff, as general manager of their business, conducted under the names *239of the Harris Rubber Company, Goodyear Raincoat Company and Lesser Waist Company, during a period of two years. By the contract of employment plaintiff was to receive a fixed salary of fifty dollars per week, and in addition thereto ten per cent of the net profits of the business. He has received the weekly salary and has drawn the sum of $811.51 on account of his percentage of the net profits.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Boisnot v. WilsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1904
  2. McAleer v. SinnottAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1898
  3. Crawford v. CanaryAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1898

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Donohue v. Lawyers' Advertising Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1912
  2. Meisel v. Spielman Motor Sales Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1942
  3. Traurig v. Caravel Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1919

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API