Legal Opinion
Fischer v. Oklahoma City
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided September 24, 1946No. 32377PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBayless, J.
This appeal from the district court of Oklahoma county by O. H. Fischer et ux. questions the correctness of the judgment of that court in favor of the City of Oklahoma City, a municipal corporation, et al. Fischers brought the action to recover certain real estate, which City had earlier taken from them by the exercise of the power of eminent domain.
Fischers first contend that city had no power under Oklahoma law to condemn a -fee-simple title to this property. At the outset they are familiar with our decisions in Ramsey v. Leeper, 168 Okla. 43, 31 P. 2d 852, and Harn v. State, 184 Okla. 306,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Ramsey v. LeeperSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
- Delfeld v. City of TulsaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942
- Harn v. State Ex Rel. WilliamsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
- City of Tulsa v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
- Ruth v. Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Sublett v. City of TulsaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1965
- Elliott v. City of GuthrieSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1986
- Graham v. City of DuncanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1960
- B. Willis, C.P.A., Inc. v. BNSF Railway Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
- City of Pryor Creek v. Public Service Co. of OklahomaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1975
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.