Legal Opinion
Park v. Greenwood County
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Decided October 31, 1934No. 13931PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
Mr. Justice Stabler.
It appears that Greenwood County has made application to the Public Works Administration, under the provisions of the Revenue Bond Act of May 8, 1933 (38 Stat. at Large, p. 411), as amended, for a loan to be used in the erection of a hydro-electric plant at “Buzzard Roost” on the Saluda River; the electrical energy generated to be sold by the county to cities, towns, corporations, and individuals within and without its territorial limits. This action was brought by the plaintiff, a citizen and taxpayer of the county, to enjoin the…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Winston v. City of SpokaneWashington Supreme Court · 1895
- Lillard v. MeltonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1915
- Briggs v. Greenville CountySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1926
- Haesloop v. City CouncilSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1923
- Green v. City of Rock HillSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1929
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Clarke v. South Carolina Public Service AuthoritySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1935
- Elliott v. McNairSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1967
- Gaud v. WalkerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1949
- Duke Power Co. v. Greenwood CountyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1937
- State Ex Rel. Coleman v. LewisSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1936
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.