Legal Opinion

United States v. Marra

District Court, W.D. New York

Decided April 23, 1930PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ADLER, District Judge.

Under the facts in this case, I find that there was no invitation given by the defendant Sam Marra to the prohibition officers to search the premises. The statement of the officers to the defendant, on presenting themselves at the door, that they were prohibition officers and were going to inspect the premises, and the reply of the defendant, “All right,” might be said to he acquiescence, but under the circumstances did not amount to an invitation to enter and search. In re Lobosco (D. C.) 11 F.(2d) 892; United States v. Kozan (D. C.) 37 F.(2d) 415, at page 418.

In this…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. Di CorvoDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1927
  2. In re LoboscoDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1926
  3. United States v. RabsteinDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1930
  4. United States v. KozanDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1930

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Bumper v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Judd v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1951
  3. United States v. Ernest T. PageCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962
  4. United States v. Ruth SmithCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1962
  5. Paprskar v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1972

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API