Legal Opinion

In re Lobosco

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided March 26, 1926No. 12070PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THOMPSON, District Judge.

From the petition and answer, and admissions at the hearing, the following facts appear:

The petitioner is. a druggist holding a permit to use alcohol in his business, conducted at a drug store in the city of Philadelphia. On February 25, 1926, several prohibition agents entered the defendants store to make an inspection of the liquor on hand and his records required to be kept by section 34 of title 2 of the National Prohibition Act (Comp. St. Ann. Supp. 1923, § 10138%u). The prohibition agents made themselves known .as such, one of them, Hugh Hays, Jr., exhibiting…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  2. Boyd v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  3. United States v. KrausDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1921
  4. Dukes v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1921
  5. Legman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1924

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. United States v. Ernest T. PageCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962
  2. United States v. GrossDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1956
  3. United States v. MarraDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1930
  4. Phillips v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1983
  5. Bowles v. Beatrice Creamery Co.District Court, D. Wyoming · 1944

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API