Legal Opinion

City of Grandfield v. Hammonds

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided April 15, 1924No. 13665PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

PINKHAM, C.

This action was brought to recover damages for negligently causing the death of the plaintiffs’ son, who was about three years of age. The plaintiffs allege that the defendant, the city of Grandfield, owned, managed, and conducted a water-works system for the purpose of supplying water to the inhabitants of said town and that as a part of said water-works system the said defendant owned and used a well, and that the said well, partly filled with water, had been covered with boards or plank; that the said covering over the said well had become rotten and loose and had been…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Holbrook v. AldrichMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1897
  2. Bottom's v. HawksSupreme Court of Vermont · 1911
  3. Rugg v. ClappSupreme Court of Vermont · 1911
  4. Faurot v. Oklahoma Wholesale Grocery Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
  5. Turner v. Durant Cotton Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Julian v. Sinclair Oil & Gas Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
  2. Lohrenz v. LaneSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1990
  3. Town of Depew v. KilgoreSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
  4. Jenkins v. DavisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
  5. Keck v. WoodringSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1948

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API