Legal Opinion

State v. Roberts

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided November 23, 1966PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

Defendant was convicted of assault and robbery while armed with a loaded Mauser pistol. At the trial on the case he was represented by appointed counsel. After the conviction another attorney was appointed to represent him on this appeal. That attorney perfected the appeal. The attorney later filed an affidavit in which he explained his study of the case and his inability to find any error. He swore that he could not conscientiously proceed further with the appeal. The trial court permitted the attorney to withdraw. No other attorney was appointed and defendant has filed briefs in his own…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State of Oregon v. DeweyOregon Supreme Court · 1956
  2. State of Oregon v. ElliottOregon Supreme Court · 1954
  3. State v. Du BoisOregon Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Richardson v. WilliardOregon Supreme Court · 1965
  5. State v. EvansOregon Supreme Court · 1924

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. RomeroCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1969
  2. State v. RobertsOregon Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Earl Leslie Roberts v. H. C. CuppCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970
  4. Roberts v. GladdenDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API