Legal Opinion

Huebner v. Sales Promotion, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided July 3, 1984No. 6054-0-IIPublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWorswick, J.

In January 1980, Richard Huebner signed a partnership agreement with Tire Cosmotology Rental (TCR) for the purpose of permitting Huebner to rent tire customizing machines to others in Washington. TCR is the name under which Sales Promotion, Inc. (SPI) does business. SPI is a corporate subsidiary of Tire Cosmotology, Inc. (TCI), a Texas corporation. Huebner contributed $100,000 to the partnership, and TCR provided 100 tire customizing machines. The agreement required Huebner to place all the machines with rental customers within 365 days or be in default. Upon default, TCR was entitled to…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  3. World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Calder v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Rush v. SavchukSupreme Court of the United States · 1980

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. American Business Interiors, Inc. v. Haworth, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1986
  2. Barker v. Advanced Silicon Materials, LLCCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2006
  3. John Does v. CompCare, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1988
  4. Barker v. Advanced Silicon Materials, LLCCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2006
  5. Perry v. HamiltonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1988

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API