Legal Opinion

State v. Henderson

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 15, 1970No. 21PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBobbitt, C.J.

Although they present their fourteen assignments of error in a joint statement, each defendant filed a separate brief.

Assignments of Error Nos. 2 and 4 are based on defendants’ exceptions to the denial of their motions tinder G.S. 15-173 for judgments as in case of nonsuit.

In the consideration of these assignments, we apply the well-established and oft-stated rules summarized in 2 Strong’s North Carolina Index 2d, Criminal Law § 104, as follows: “On motion to nonsuit, the evidence must be considered in the light most favorable to the state, and the state is entitled to every reasonable…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Peek v. Wachovia Bank & Trust CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
  2. State v. . SatterfieldSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
  3. State v. DowSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
  4. Powell v. DanielSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  5. State v. MillsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. State v. ThomasSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
  2. State v. ThompsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  3. State v. DavisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  4. State v. ArnoldSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
  5. State v. VickSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API