State v. Henderson
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtBobbitt, C.J.
Although they present their fourteen assignments of error in a joint statement, each defendant filed a separate brief.
Assignments of Error Nos. 2 and 4 are based on defendants’ exceptions to the denial of their motions tinder G.S. 15-173 for judgments as in case of nonsuit.
In the consideration of these assignments, we apply the well-established and oft-stated rules summarized in 2 Strong’s North Carolina Index 2d, Criminal Law § 104, as follows: “On motion to nonsuit, the evidence must be considered in the light most favorable to the state, and the state is entitled to every reasonable…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Peek v. Wachovia Bank & Trust CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
- State v. . SatterfieldSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
- State v. DowSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
- Powell v. DanielSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
- State v. MillsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- State v. ThomasSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
- State v. ThompsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
- State v. DavisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
- State v. ArnoldSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
- State v. VickSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.