Legal Opinion

Green v. Transitron Electronic Corp.

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided January 16, 1964No. Nos. 6176, 6179, 6190PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HARTIGAN, Circuit Judge.

We have before us three appeals from the allowance and disallowance of counsel fees by the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts, the requests for such fees arising out of work performed by the attorneys in producing an Agreement of Compromise and Settlement under which the sum of $5,300,000 was paid into court by defendants-appellees, Leo and David Bakalar, for payment of counsel fees, disbursements and distribution to stockholders in settlement of five law suits brought against the defendants.

Transitron Electronic Corporation is in the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Sprague v. Ticonic National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  2. Trustees v. GreenoughSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  3. Central Railroad & Banking Co. of Ga. v. PettusSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  4. Milwaukee Towne Corp. v. Loew's, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1951
  5. Twentieth Century-Fox Film Corp. v. Brookside Theatre Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1952

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Shlensky v. DorseyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1978
  2. Alpine Pharmacy, Inc., an Illinois Corporation v. Chas. Pfizer & Co., Inc., and Cotler Drugs, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1973
  3. Pete v. United Mine Workers of America Welfare & Retirement Fund of 1950Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1975
  4. City of New York v. Darling-DelawareDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1977
  5. Stephen Pete on Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated, Louis Belton, Plaintiff-Intervenor-Appellees v. United Mine Workers of America Welfare and Retirement Fund of 1950, Slimp Kiser, on Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated v. Harry Huge, and United Mine Workers of America Welfare and Retirementfund of 1950, Slimp Kiser, on Behalf of Himself and All Other Persons Who Have Been Deniedpension Payments From the United Mine Workers of America Welfare and Retirementfund v. W. A. BoyleCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1975

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API