Legal Opinion
State v. McLemore
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided December 26, 1989No. 55463PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SATZ, Judge.
Double jeopardy is the determinative issue in this case. Defendant, James McLe-more, was convicted of violating the City of St. Louis’ Ordinance No. 15.130.050, which prohibits a person from carrying “on or about his person any firearm ... beyond the property limits of his residence or business premises in the city” except under specified conditions. Subsequently, on the same facts, defendant was convicted of carrying a concealed weapon in violation of our state statute § 571.030.1(1) RSMo 1986. Defendant contends his conviction on the state charge following his conviction on the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Benton v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Brown v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Iannelli v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- United States v. EwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- State v. McTushSupreme Court of Missouri · 1992
- State v. PolsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 2004
- State v. McKeeMissouri Court of Appeals · 1992
- Tilley v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2006
- State v. WhiteMissouri Court of Appeals · 2000
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.