Legal Opinion
Securities & Exchange Commission v. Minas De Artemisa, S. A.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided July 9, 1945No. 10907PublishedCited by 35 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HEALY, Circuit Judge.
The primary question presented in this, case is whether, on application of the-Securities and Exchange Commission, the court in Arizona may order a corporation-subject to its jurisdiction to produce books, and records located in Mexico.
In 1931 one Kendall owned all but the-qualifying shares of Sonora Copper Mining-Company, a Colorado corporation, which held a group of mining claims in Sonora, Mexico. At that time Kendall organized' Artemisa Mines, Inc., under the laws of Arizona, and took a majority of its authorized shares in exchange for the stock, of the Colorado…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Consolidated Rendering Co. v. VermontSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- California Development Co. v. New Liverpool Salt Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1909
- Hobbs v. Tom Reed Gold Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1913
- Washington-Virginia R. Co. v. Real Estate Trust Co. of PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Kempson v. KempsonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1902
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Steele v. Bulova Watch Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Richmark Corp. v. Timber Falling ConsultantsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Federal Trade Commission v. Compagnie De Saint-Gobain-Pont-A-MoussonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
- First National City Bank of New York v. Internal Revenue Service of United States Treasury DepartmentCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1959
- Montship Lines, Limited v. Federal Maritime Board and the United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1961
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.