Legal Opinion

United States v. Donziger

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided March 29, 2021No. 20-1710-crUnpublished

1Opinion of the Court

20-1710-cr United States v. Donziger UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT SUMMARY ORDER RULINGS BY SUMMARY ORDER DO NOT HAVE PRECEDENTIAL EFFECT. CITATION TO A SUMMARY ORDER FILED ON OR AFTER JANUARY 1, 2007, IS PERMITTED AND IS GOVERNED BY FEDERAL RULE OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE 32.1 AND THIS COURT’S LOCAL RULE 32.1.1. WHEN CITING A SUMMARY ORDER IN A DOCUMENT FILED WITH THIS COURT, A PARTY MUST CITE EITHER THE FEDERAL APPENDIX OR AN ELECTRONIC DATABASE (WITH THE NOTATION “SUMMARY ORDER”). A PARTY CITING TO A SUMMARY ORDER MUST SERVE A COPY OF IT ON ANY PARTY NOT REPRESENTED BY…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Ricky Baker v. David Alan DorfmanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
  2. United States v. Orlando Gonzales Claudio and Isaac Camacho-NegronCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
  3. United States v. Mutulu ShakurCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
  4. United States v. Luz Maria Berrios-BerriosCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
  5. United States v. SabhnaniCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API