Legal Opinion
CL-Alexanders Laing v. Goldfeld
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided September 5, 1989No. 87 Civ. 6113 (MBM)PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
MUKASEY, District Judge.
Plaintiff CL-Alexanders Laing & Cruickshank (“Alexanders”), a London investment banking firm, sues on behalf of a class of British citizens and institutions who bought two million shares in Container Industries, Inc. (“Container”), a Delaware corporation with its principal place of business in New Jersey. The purchase, part of a private placement, was made in Great Britain in June 1986. Plaintiff acted as underwriter for the offering. Plaintiff hired defendant Arthur Andersen & Co. of England (“Andersen-U.K.”) to provide a “comfort letter” for…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. FalconSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Sirota v. Solitron Devices, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982
- Philadelphia Electric Co. v. Anaconda American Brass Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1968
- Bersch v. Drexel Firestone, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- In re Vivendi Universal, S.A. Securities LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2007
- Ansari v. New York UniversityDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1998
- Takeda v. Turbodyne Technologies, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 1999
- CL-Alexanders Laing & Cruickshank v. GoldfeldDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1990
- In re Namenda Direct Purchaser Antitrust Litig.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2018
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.