Legal Opinion
Lake v. Emigh
Montana Supreme Court
Decided January 5, 1946No. 8584PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Angstman
This is an action for personal injuries.
The complaint charges that plaintiff was a tenant of Eli Yirta on November 25, 1935, and as such had the common use along with other tenants of Yirta, occupying separate buildings, of a mechanical device and apparatus for hanging clothes to dry; that the apparatus consisted of a clothesline running over pulleys fastened between the buildings and outbuildings of the premises leased to her and the other tenants; that as a part of the apparatus Yirta provided a ladder with steps and a small platform at the top thereof for placing baskets of clothes and…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Molt v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1912
- Callahan v. LoughranCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- Richmond v. Standard Elkhorn Coal Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1927
- Finch v. WillmottCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
- Bush v. BakerMontana Supreme Court · 1915
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Tapia v. Panhandle Steel Erectors CompanyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1967
- Shannon v. Howard S. Wright Const. Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1979
- Cassaday v. City of BillingsMontana Supreme Court · 1959
- Lake v. EmighMontana Supreme Court · 1948
- Hanson v. ColgroveMontana Supreme Court · 1968
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.