Legal Opinion
Southern Timber Purchasers Council v. Alcock
District Court, N.D. Georgia
Decided July 29, 1991No. Civ. 1:89-cv-2741-ODEPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
ORINDA D. EVANS, District Judge.
This action arising under the National Forest Management Act, 16 U.S.C. § 1604 et seq. (“the Forest Act”) is before the court on the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment. Fed.R.Civ.P. 56.
This dispute arises from the actions of Defendants, officials of the United States Forest Service (“the Forest Service”), restricting timber cutting within % of a mile of a colony site of red cockaded woodpeckers. The red cockaded woodpecker is considered an endangered species under the Endangered Species Act, 16 U.S.C. § 1531 et seq. See, 50 C.F.R. § 1711(h).…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- McKart v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Federal Trade Commission v. Standard Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
- William Cronin v. United States Department of AgricultureCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
- Truman Outland v. Civil Aeronautics Board, Delta Airlines, Inc., Air Line Pilots Association, International, IntervenorsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1960
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Wilderness Society v. BosworthDistrict Court, D. Montana · 2000
- Forest Guardians v. ThomasDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 1997
- SNR Roulements v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2004